Monday, 16 September 2013

Rape Case: Lets Talk about such Women of India too!

Man freed in rape case, court says it was extra-marital affair

Court said married woman, who had four children, got involved in affair during subsistence of her marriage.


A man accused of raping a married woman on the false promise of marriage has been acquitted by a Delhi court, which observed it was a case of an "extra-marital affair being converted into rape".

The court said the married woman, who had four children, got involved in the affair during subsistence of her marriage and to save herself from "embarrassment", filed a false case against her paramour when her husband came to know about their relation.

"This trend of extra-marital affairs being converted into rape cases is coming up as several such cases have been filed in court on similar allegations. When a woman herself is not in a capacity to marry another man during the subsistence of her marriage, then why should her paramour be prosecuted, incarcerated and be tried for rape when it is actually just an extra-marital affair.

"This kind of unscrupulous litigation is required to be nipped in the bud itself," Additional Sessions Judge Nivedita Anil Sharma said, adding with changing times, the understanding of "morality" is also changing.

The court acquitted Moti Nagar resident Samir of the charges of rape and cheating, saying there is no material on record that the 25-year-old woman was forced into physical relations by the accused on a false promise of marriage.

"In fact what emerges from the evidence of prosecutrix is that there appears to be an element of an extra-marital affair between her and the accused which came within the knowledge of her husband due to which she left or was made to leave her matrimonial home and consequently the rape case was lodged (against accused) probably to save embarrassment for herself and maintain relations with her husband," the court said.

According to the prosecution, the woman filed a complaint with the police alleging that from January to April 20, this year, Samir repeatedly raped her on the false promise that he would marry her.


Crime against men today increasing a rapid speed , but who cares for that? 
Lets Talk about 21st Century such women and LAW of India also as such news always suppressed by Electronic media houses of India to Brain wash common Men that the Sexual assault or crime only men do against women and women never do such crime in India . 

In this case another Men also suffering  his name is "Indian Husband" , have any one shown the concern?
  • The married women's husband can't file a case against her as adultery IPC497 is not a crime in India.
  • Husband can't file Divorce case also , as the moment he will do that , she will fire the 498A , Dowry Act , Domestic violence act and CRPC125 also.
  • Result Husband will loss the child , he will be out of his own home and have to pay the money in the cute name of "Maintenance" , let he beg/borrow/steal,  irrespective the prove wife at fault as CRPC125 she will just have to say , I had lived in adultery , but at present not living in adultery as the word in CRPC125 long back NCW changed from 'Lived in adultery" to 'Living in adultery" to deny any maintenance.
Media will never talk a single word about such cases and court will only make some comment , but will not send such women behind the bar , forget about any other Punishment.

If we found a cases like this related to a Married men , forget about court order even a allegations like this , not only the Husband , along with him his age old mother/unmarried sisters also had been put behind the bar under 498A , Dowry act , forced to provide a home to wife under DV act, hefty maintenance under CRPC125 and then keep making round the courts next 15 to 20 years to prove that the allegation is false and fabricated.

Society's Alpha Men's group, will continue to engage in abuse the "Mango Men" day and night through their twitter account , women activist will keep silence and end results some survey few days back confirmed the growth rate of women getting involved in adultery is more than 30% year to year.
SIF and their associated NGO repeatedly advice, caution to Government, LAW Makers , Justice Verma as well as to all Media house , to stop the abuse the "Rape law" in the name of non-Consent so called "Promise of marriage" , but who cares?
A women in India can have physical relation with any men with or without any promise , the same is never termed Rape , but even a verbal allegation against a men without any medical evidence also can be termed as "Gang Rape" and any TOM/DICK/HARRY can be put behind the bar in the name of Investigations and the accused threaten to victim.

History witness Injustice somewhere is direct threat of justice every where.

Join Save Indian Family Movement to Stop the legal terrorism of India and demand to replace the word Men/Women to "Person" to all crime related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all Women born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all Men born in Criminal family. 


Wednesday, 11 September 2013

Shocking 5 to 6 % Shortage of marriage able Men vs Women In India


Every day you are witness of Huge cry that the Girls Child are less vs Boys in India due to Female foeticide . In the name of Female foeticide huge fund had been collected , many tax prayer money had been wasted in advertisement and many program.
The chances of Female foeticide lies on loophole in Abortion law, but no one have dare to touch that and keep blaming Indian men, where many of our survey shows more than 90% men want a girls child , where as it is women members of the family desperate for Boy child.

Medical termination of pregnancy is a prerogative bestowed by Indian law exclusively on women and men have no role to play. (Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Section 4 (b) - No pregnancy shall be terminated except with the consent of the pregnant woman.)

But how many gone through the Census data and analysis, except that we have 940 women against 1000 men in India ?

Some hidden fact is here , if you go through the Single Year Age Data - C13 Table (India/States/UTs )

You have to go through the data of 2001 vs 2011, what change?

( A child in 2001 of age 1yr should be 11yr in 2011 right?)
Missing women Vs Men :











So on that basis if we compare :

Total Men missing : 4.16Crs/57.66%
Total Women missing: 3.07crs/42.34%.
Means : Approx 1.11Crs Men are missing more than women in India.
So if 577 men are missing , only 423 women are missing and difference of 153 per 1000 population.

Now Let see the number of Boys vs Girls ( 1-10Years data of 2011)

Boys : 13.03Crs/52.27%

Girls : 11.9Crs./47.73%

So as a base of Total Population for 1000 boys are 523 and  Girls are 477 a deficit of 45 per 1000 population.

Means the boys is extra : 1.13Crs.
Now when census will happen in 2021 will not 1.11 crs men will be vanish than women?
The most important think we are talking about what will happen in future , but have any one shown any concern of present situation?
Every time we see the cry the girls parents , women activist that to marry off Girls is not so easy, so they have to offer dowry etc.
We always wonder if the supply of men is 1000 vs 940 women as claimed by Census data, why there should not be shortage of Women and reverse dowry system had been started , right? Why Girls parents have to search day night a NRI boy ?
Here all gone wrong and even media journalist/editors had been also fooled by one sided analysis.
The truth lie, the average age of a men vs. women difference is about 3 to 5 years. Even Law also the marriage age for women is 18years and men is 21years.

Let consider women marriageable age 18 to 35 vs Men 21 to 38 years.
Available Men : 17.2Crs vs available women : 19.44Crs.

Means shortage of 2.42 Crs men and 533 women available against 467men , a deficit of 66 men(6.64%).

Let consider women marriageable age 18 to 37 vs Men 21 to 40 years.

Available Men : 18.94Crs vs available women :20.82 Crs.

Means shortage of 1.88 Crs men and 524 women available against 476men a deficit of 44 ( 4.73%).
Now one hand we are crying for future and neglecting the Present situation result there is no improvement observed.
All over world if we see as a total the 5 to 6 % more boys birth is as normal keeping in mind the missing Men are always higher than women , but who cares for that.
When our LAW makers form LAW and Policy with the half hacked data of some women organizations which not only mislead the media Journalist/editors to common people also.
Result we always see the operation in Right Leg , when the pain is in Left Leg.

In 2011 census data shows : 
Total Population : 121.02 Crs
Men : 62.37Crs/51.54%
Women : 58.65Crs/48.46%.
So for 1000 Population the Men is 515 and women is 485, means the difference is 31 per 1000 population.
But if any one say the difference is 31 , it will not be a breaking news , so how to increase the same ?
The Women organizations changed the base of calculation from Total Population to Men population as Base , result shows 940 women vs 1000 men, which is totally incorrect in field as the difference is not 60 , it is 30 only.
Statistics are really Mini Skirt!!! 

When you say 940 women against 1000 men , common people think it is 6% , but reality is on field the women population is less by 3.07% , not 6%.
In Total Population men more by 3.07% than women and it will go down to 2.29 by default in 2021 census , but never mentioned 15.31% men are getting missing more than women also , result misleading LAW policy and wastage of money.
The most important issue never come to knowledge in India there is a shortage of about 5 to 6% marriage able men compared to women.
Now the Question is who will supply the extra men to Indian women which we witness shortage in the range of 4 to 6 percent?


May be we have to import many more male from country like Bangladesh, Nepal for our Indian women.







Tuesday, 10 September 2013

Who is more possessive a wife against her husband or media Journalist against men?

Stop Abuse of IPC498A act in India


Many common people unaware the fact of IPC497 , for a wife even adultery also is not a crime (it is a rewarding option and free money earning business for the whole life), but for a man even an allegation of “Name-calling” is crime and not only the man, his mother/sister/age-old father also can be put behind the bar under 498A or DV act.

Any allegation by a wife against husband to be considered as TRUE irrespective the same is true or false. Same way a Case was registered against a Husband, that his wife suspects his relationship with another women in his office , so she suicide.  There was no evidence to that aligation or ill treatment to her , but our great law booked him under 498A , 306.
More surprise the lower court and high court also termed him as wife killer .


The person have to suffer all trouble legally, socially, have to run pillar to post to get bail and spend months in Jail without any investigation as 498A is non-bailable and at last SC found , he is not Guilty , but who will compensate him for the incorrect Judgments of Lower court and high court ?
 Writing a judgment for the bench, Justice Radhakrishnan said to charge a husband for abatement of suicide, the prosecution must establish that the wife's suicide was a direct result of the extra-marital affair.

"Prosecution has to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased committed suicide and the accused abetted the commission of suicide. But for the alleged extra-marital relationship, which if proved, could be illegal and immoral, nothing has been brought out by the prosecution to show that the accused had provoked, incited or induced the wife to commit suicide," the court said.

"We have on facts found that, at best, the relationship of A-1 (the husband) and A-2 (the other woman) was a one-sided love affair. The accused might have developed some liking towards A-2, his colleague, (but) all the same, the facts disclose that A-1 had discharged his marital obligations towards the deceased. There is no evidence of physical or mental torture demanding dowry," the court said.

Referring to the wife's suicide note, the bench said, "On reading the suicide note, one can infer that the deceased was so possessive of her husband, and was always under emotional stress that she might lose her husband. Too much of possessiveness could also lead to serious emotional stress, over and above the fact that she had one abortion and her daughter died after few days of birth."

Just for a moment if the case had been reverse, like a Husband suicide with a suspect that his wife had relationship with other men at office, will a case will be registered against the women?





      Sorry to say the answer is a Big No , as neither 498A or IPC497 applicable for Women. LAW commission had asked to make the adultery crime for both gender , but our LAW makers had not taken any action and NCW even further go ahead with amended in CRPC125 , that a women should get maintenance from husband in spite it had been proved she was living in adultery, as they changed the word "Lived in adultery" to "Living in adultery".         
Means a women can lived in adultery, husband proved in court , but after few months she can come back and say , now I am not living in adultery and claim maintenance under CRPC125 again.  




For Indian men, it does not matter, irrespective the allegation is true or false, not only you, your mother, sister, age old father will be thrown out of your own house under DV act, just one line complain by your wife.   

But some of our media Journalist are so possessive for any judgments in favor of men they also can't digest and as soon as the judgment passed they write :

Adultery is not cruelty, Supreme Court says. Times of India.




They twist the fact that SC said passiveness of a wife for Husband and without any evidence of adultery of husband can't be a ground for Cruelty.




If they had not Possessive against men , then they must have highlighted how a men had suffered in wrong 498A cases as his wife was possessive against him  without any evidence.

Merely being "intimate" with another woman is not sufficient ground for a man to be held guilty of inflicting cruelty on his wife on the charge of failing to discharge his marital obligations, the Supreme Court ruled on. 





If a Husband had done adultery the same is Punishable as per IPC497 , but how can the same can be a crime when there is no evidence of his wrong doing or ill-treatment of wife under 498A?

Yes the great law 498A is there where you can book any TOM/DICK or Harry and even lower court/high court convect you on mere assumption a crime which You had never done.



So, the question arise who is more possessive  a wife against her husband or media Journalist against men?

Friday, 6 September 2013

HINDU SUCCESSION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2013 By ANURAG SINGH THAKUR, M.P.

Already Kapil Sibal desperate to pass a Husband Killer Property Garbing LAW in name of Easy Divorce to Women.



The main reason had given that women in India does not have property and whatever a Husband earned to that wife also have contribution,so she should get the right irrespective the marriage run for 10 days or 10years. So, instead of making the same Spouse , he pushed that only Husbands immovable+movable + inherited/inheritable assets to be considered by Court and wife should get her share irrespective the Divorce happens for the Fault of Husband or wife.

Any immovable+movable + inherited/inheritable assets belong to wife should not be touched at all .

The question he never answered what about the property immovable or movable assets a wife earned , does not have any contribution of Husband to that?

The arguments totally overlooked,  the Hindu succession Act provide the daughter also share in  inherited/inheritable assets of her parents , why the same should be considered and if her own parents or brothers does not give her her share and she face financial Hardship, why to blame the husbands family and punish them for no fault?

Now the Hypocracy of LAW makers witness in another amended in the name of  HINDU SUCCESSION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2013 By ANURAG SINGH THAKUR, M.P.

A women's self-acured Property/assets ( movable+movable) in absence of Husband's/child, it should go to women's Parents only not to Husband's Family heirs, means what ever assets ( movable+immovable) in her name let it be she earned from husband or husbands family, but it will go to her parental heirs only. 

Where the need of such amended the main reason given :

The proposed amendment has been necessitated in view of the vast changes in the
social milieu over the past few years. Over the years, women have taken a stride in all spheres
of life. The consequence is that women are acquiring property earned by their own skill.
These situations do not seem to have been in the contemplation of legislators when the Act
was initially enacted.
Means it is established self acured assets earned by a wife , there is no contribution of Husband or her family members, fair enough !!

But the unanswered question , why the same logic does not apply when wife or family claim her contribution in husband's not only self accrued assets even inherited/inheritable assets?

Yes, that is the ground reality as I also witness in last 10 years I am in Delhi and stayed in 6 rented Home and among that 5 house owner was a Women only not a Man!

Even many people do not know in agriculture Land more than 9.2percent in the name of Women , more than 90% movable assets in the form of Gold/Diamond/Jewellery in custody of women only, but Kapil Sibal came out some imaginary figure only 2% assets belong to women without any supporting authentic data.

As per cencess data In Delhi approx 30 Lacks House 9.2 lacks are rented house and 80% of those house owners are Women, not men.

Now to make a LAW in this country the logic and ground reality does not matter when it comes to grab men's hard earned assets by Legal Extortion.

Indian Men are suppose to work his whole life like a donkey and one day die in Heart attack. In case he face any financial hardship , he can't even use his own saving for rainy days.

Law makers repeatedly misusing  the provision of constitution 15(3) with logic positive discrimination Government already make many biased law like 498A, DV act, CRPC125 and now on the way New Marriage LAW ( IRBM).

Our Supreme Court is silent for more than 30 years against government's such abuse of Indian constitution's special provision under 15(3), as per their wish and killing the Natural Justice.

Result today witness marriage relationship converted to a money extortion business, but we have to wait and see does our SC judges have courage like China SC, who had made null/void such law, as any rights comes through marriage towards the property/assets of husbands does not valid after Divorce. No fault Divorce can't  be a ground to snatch each others hard earned assets, which against basic fundamental rights of individual to live and liberty.

Media , Judiciary, LAW makers no one will take corrective action , but many men today asking #Y2marry?

Injustice some where is direct threat of Justice every where , hope all understand and demand the word Spouse instead of Husband/wife, so that the LAW should not be Unfair/biased and became a TOOL of Extortion like 498A , DV act.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A BILL further to amend the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Bill No. 17 of 2013 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA.

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-fourth Year of the Republic of India as follows:—
1. (1) This Act may be called the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2013.
(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification
in the Official Gazette, appoint.

2. In section 3 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the
principal Act), after clause ( j), the following clause shall be added, namely:—
“(k) “self-acquired property” means any property including both movable and
immovable property acquired by a female Hindu by her own skill or exertion.”


Amendment of section 3. 30 of 1956

3. In section 15 of the principal Act, in sub-section (2), after clause (b), the following clause shall be added, namely:—
“(c) if a female Hindu dies intestate, her self-acquired property, in the absence of husband and any son or daughter of the deceased (including the children of any predeceased son or daughter), shall devolve, not upon the heirs as referred to in subsection (1) in the order specified therein, but in the following manner:
(i) firstly, upon the mother and the father of the female;
(ii) secondly, upon the heirs of the father of the female;
(iii) thirdly, upon the heirs of the mother of the female; and
(iv) lastly, upon the heirs of the husband of the female.”.

Amendment of section 15.

STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS

The proposed amendment has been necessitated in view of the vast changes in the
social milieu over the past few years. Over the years, women have taken a stride in all spheres
of life. The consequence is that women are acquiring property earned by their own skill.
These situations do not seem to have been in the contemplation of legislators when the Act
was initially enacted.

Social justice and the principle of equality as enshrined in article 14 of our Constitution
demands that the women should be treated equally, both in the economic and the social
sphere. Further, the Constitution of India not only grants equality to women but under article
15(3) also empowers the State to adopt measures of positive discrimination in favour of
women for neutralizing the cumulative socio-economic, educational and political
disadvantages faced by them.

The proposed Bill seeks to make changes in sections 3 and 15 of the Hindu Succession
Act, 1956 so that first preference is given to the parental heirs of the wife over the husband’s
heirs to inherit the self-acquired property of a women dying intestate in the absence of
husband and any son or daughter of the deceased (including the children of any predeceased
son or daughter).

It is expedient in public interest to make the aforesaid amendments with regard to self acquired
property of women in the parent Act.

Hence this Bill.

NEW DELHI; ANURAG SINGH THAKUR
November 29, 2012

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

Surrogate Child A Option for Child less Father of India?

Save Indian Family Yahoo Group every day we witness such cry from many Indian Fathers , who are refused to meet their own child years together in spite of paying child maintenance or even court order. Many Fathers have child visiting rights from court , but their wife do not brother to obey the court order and when husband go back to court to implement the order, they get only date after date.


On the other hand we witness cases where wife left the child , go to some world tour or get married to some other guy and after 3 or 4 years suddenly one day come to court and apply for child custody , the same immediately granted not even in Guardianship act, but in Domestic violence act.

Means getting the access of Child for a Father's if his wife refuse is impossible to get as per Indian law lead to huge mental abuse and depression among them. 
Recently we witness many suicide cases due to such emotional abuse going on India and neither Judiciary, Media or Law makers shown any concern to Promote the Joint Child Custody system in India. They failed to recornise it is not father or mother right , it is Child right to have access to both parents and money does not come in picture.

Child Visiting for Indian fathers day by day became very difficult due to various biased LAW specially Domestic Violence act , where by a single compliant the Fathers had restricted to meet the child as by default.

Mr. Sayad a bright IT engineer end his life in Bangalore in End his life in 2008 and before suicide he put a YouTube Video for the whole world how his wife ensure he can't meet his own child.
In 2013 in Delhi Mr. Rajesh a media Journalist also end his life as in spite of fight in court last 4 years and paying child maintenance, his wife not allowed to meet his own child and one day he end his life.

Last year in Bangalore in case of Mr. Rudy when he want to meet his child the court order to pay 10L rupees, he paid the same but more than 1 years past his wife still not bring the child to allow him to meet. 
Mr. Rup , flighted 2-years in court to get a child visiting order , but in last 1 years able to see his child hardly 30 min as his ex-wife always ready with new new story that child is not available in home.
Visit to family court room forget about child custody , even to meet his own child they have to fight in court for years and if at all the visiting rights given like 1 or 2hrs in a month, that also not obeyed by wives. Child visiting for Men in India became like a Paid service TV serial or a movie where the Ticket you have to buy with huge cost and that also no grantee after buy the Child visiting Tickets, you will be allowed to see your child.

More than 80% of such court order violated by wife under whose custody the child is and Judges unable to implement their own order.
Bottom line the Fathers of India had been treated as Free ATM machine only. More than 95% cases the child custody refused to them and even do not allowed a visiting rights for 2 or 3 hours in a week.

Result last 2 or 3 years many man of India looking for the option of Sarogated Child and attractively pushing for THE ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (REGULATION) BILL, 2008 (Click for Link)


While official statistics on the number of surrogacy cases arranged in India are not available, anecdotal evidence suggest a sharp increase. According to Delhi-based resource group SAMA, reproductive tourism in India alone is valued at over $450 million a year and was forecast by the Indian Council for Medical Research to be a six-billion-dollar-a-year market in 2008. Reports in 2011 pegged the market at over Rs2,000 crore.


Determination of status of the child –


(1) A child born to a married couple through the use of assisted reproductive technology shall be presumed to be the legitimate child of the couple, having been born in wedlock and  with the consent of both spouses, and shall have identical legal rights as a legitimate child born through sexual intercourse.

(2) A child born to an unmarried couple through the use of assisted
reproductive technology, with the consent of both the parties, shall be the legitimate child of both parties.

(3) In the case of a single woman the child will be the legitimate child of the woman, and in the case of a single man the child will be the legitimate child of the man.

(4) In case a married or unmarried couple separates or gets divorced, as the case may be, after both parties consented to the assisted reproductive technology treatment but before the child is born, the child shall be the legitimate child of the couple.

(5) A child born to a woman artificially inseminated with the stored sperm of her dead husband shall be considered as the legitimate child of the couple.

(6) If a donated ovum contains ooplasm from another donor ovum, both the donors shall be medically tested for such diseases, sexually transmitted or otherwise, as may be prescribed, and all other communicable diseases which may endanger the health of the child, and the donor of both the ooplasm and the ovum shall relinquish all parental rights in relation to such child.

(7) The birth certificate of a child born through the use of assisted reproductive technology shall contain the name or names of the parent or parents, as the case may be, who sought such use.

Laws regulating commercial surrogacy are at best fluid, differing widely from country to country. In other nations where commercial surrogacy is legal, like Russia or Ukraine, single parents or gay couples are allowed to hire a surrogate. In the U.S., regulations vary from state to state; in Arkansas, for example, single people are allowed to hire a commercial surrogate, but the rules are ambiguous when it comes to gay couples. In California, there are no restrictions on the service based on sexual orientation or marital status.

But with the Present situation of Indian biased treatment to Indian Fathers by Judiciary, LAW Makers and Media who converted the Child visiting right for Fathers = Paid service watching some TV serial/Movie show only, no emotion of child or father's taken into consideration will happily well come such step.
With the time we will see Surrogate Child only Option left for Child less Father of India as biased Domestic Violence LAW along with proposed New Divorce Bill, where your wife can run away with your child and you don't even have any Legal recourse in India to oppose that.