Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Ban on Vishwaroopam is another form of legal terrorism claims Men NGOs.



Men’s rights organizations in India, under the platform of Save Indian Family (SIF), collectively, categorically and severely condemn the ban on Kamal Hassan’s movie – Vishwaroopam.

SIF, the umbrella organization of men’s rights organizations in India, working towards creating awareness of men’s problems, supporting distressed and victimized men, demanding gender neutral laws, protesting against misuse of anti-male laws, has termed the current ban on the movie Vishwaroopam as yet another form of legal terrorism in India, where democracy and right to free speech are becoming emblems of mockery.

SIF and its allied NGOs like Save Indian Family Foundation (Bangalore), Save Family Foundation (Delhi), Men’s Rights Association (Pune) to name a few, have a completely neutral stand on the content of the movie.

They neither support nor oppose the movie and its content and make a categorical statement of not taking sides with any party involved in the Vishwaroopam controversy.

1.      Having said that, it is appalling to see the failure of the Indian Judicial System in this particular case, as the think tank of SIF believes that the primary onus for the movie goes to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) and if the protestors have an issue, if any, they must address it with the CBFC instead of filing case on the movie maker.

2.      It’s the onus and responsibility of the CBFC to determine which movies are viewable and which aren’t and what is the audience for a particular movie and if the CBFC has given the go-ahead to a particular movie, SIF sees no point in dragging Kamal Hassan into this controversy.

3.      SIF is also wary of the fact that partisan social double standards are coming up. If the claim of the protestors is that Muslims have been projected badly in the movie (if it has been done so), and hence they have a right to file a case against the movie, then where do these so-called socially active organizations vanish, when day in and day out, men are projected badly in almost every other movie.

Due to such bad portrayal of men in movies, society has become insensitive to “Violence against Men”, as a result of which, violence and crime against men never become social issues. Added to this, such portrayal of men creates an atmosphere of gagging against men which suppresses their problems and concerns.

One such movie is the movie called “Provoked” wherein a murder by a woman is justified. Another such movie is “Saat Khoon Maaf” wherein once again a criminal minded woman is projected as a victim and her blood thirst is justified by vilifying men and projecting them in bad light. These types of movies create a social atmosphere which makes it acceptable for a woman to murder a man and later claim that she did it to escape his “torture”. 

SIF alleges that when no one is bothered to raise voice against such movies which openly target the entire clan of men, why we are creating an exception for Vishwaroopam?

It’s because of such movies as above that men have been turned into “silent beasts of burden” when they are treated as FREE ATM MACHINES and UNPAID BODYGUARDS, in families and societies.Many a men who aren’t able to sustain the harassment and pressure succumb to it and commit suicide. This is directly evident from the suicide statistics published by the Ministry of Home Affairs as shown below.

We see that every year almost 80,000 men commit suicide compared to 40,000 women. So, while men aren’t double in terms of population when compared to women, but almost double the number of men do commit suicide. But because men are disposable entities, large scale suicides by men have never become a social concern let alone a social problem. And married men form the largest chunk of suicide victims as we see below,

In the year 2011, 62433 husbands committed suicides compared to 32582 wives. A cursory glance at the previous years, establishes the trend.
Year
Husband Suicides
Wife Suicides
2010
61453
31754
2009
58192
31300
2008
57639
30224
2007
57593
30064
2006
55452
29869
2005
52483
28188


The Honorable Supreme Court of India had termed misuse of Section 498A (Dowry Law) as “Legal Terrorism” as it was a clear case of state sponsored extortion of innocent men and their families. 

SIF feels the way Kamal Hassan in being treated; this is yet another form of legal terrorism wherein the Govt. has failed to action against violent protests. If the protestors had so much of an issue against the movie they could have either filed a case against the CBFC for allowing the movie to be screened or they could have simply refrained from watching the movie i.e. boycotting the movie and announcing the same using media.

Men’s rights activists had demonstrated a very peaceful style of protest against the latest Aamir Khan starrer “Talaash” which they boycotted from watching and announced the same in media. The boycott call received widespread media attention, yet there was no violence and the protest was registered and message was conveyed.

SIF also feels that the Indian Judiciary is equally at wrongs by admitting every controversial case when it claims that it is overburdened. If, the judiciary is really overburdened, there must be a strong mechanism to filter cases and not listen to every case. So, it clearly means that either judiciary is not overburdened or it likes it to be that way. Both the situations are extremely grim as it harms the ordinary litigants who have to spend years and decades in courts to get justice.

Today, Kamal Hassan is talking about leaving the country, tomorrow; many such men will leave the country as legal terrorism goes on unabated in this country where democracy and free speech are emblems of mockery.

SIF would like to conclude the press release with a final set of demands as follows:


1.      Gender neutral laws to be made.

2.      The Govt. and law makers must ensure that legal terrorism is stopped in this country so that innocent people are not harassed.
3.      National Commission for Men is formed.
4.      Men Welfare Ministry is formed.
5.      Adequate steps are taken to safeguard people from false, frivolous and vexatious litigation with the following lines being enshrined in the laws,
Notwithstanding anything contained in thelaws, whosoever makes any false and frivolous or vexatious complaint shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than two years but which may extend to five years and with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to two lakh rupees.



Join SIF Team to Stop this legal terrorism of India and demand to replace the word Husband/wife to Spouse and Men/women to Person to related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all Women born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all Men born in Criminal family.


Sunday, 27 January 2013

Woman throws acid on boyfriend's face! #AcidAttack Justice Verma do you Know?

 

Men are Human too , Don't ignore crime against men

 

Woman throws acid on boyfriend's face

New DelhiA 24-year-old woman threw acid on the face of her boyfriend in east Delhi on Sunday after he failed to fulfill his promise to marry her, police said.

Arti Dikshit, a resident of Yamuna Vihar, attacked Vineet Kumar, 25, at Cross River Mall in Anand Vihar. She feared that he was about to desert her, police said.

"We received a call and rushed Vineet to hospital. He suffered 45 per cent burn injuries," Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police Asif Mohammad Ali told IANS.


Police found Arti in Surajmal Vihar, near the mall. "We have detained her and informed her parents," said Ali.

Arti called Vineet, a resident of Maujpur, to the mall on the pretext of watching a movie. After spending two hours, they entered into an alteration over the issue of marriage, police said.

During the argument, she took out an acid bottle from her purse and threw acid on Vineet's face.
We wonder why Justice Verma was so blind and do not recornise the crime had no gender.  The electronic media always try to pupress such News.

This is not a single News there are several news also available one of them:

Woman throws acid on three siblings over property dispute »
Daughter throws acid on mother's face over family dispute »

Justice Verma and his gang will strongly argue the crime done against women is far more than against men, so let some men suffer and make the law gender bias as the life of some men or women is not valuable as the crime done by some abala nari.

But they forget it is not the numbers game, injustice some where is direct treat to justice every where. Number of Terrorist/murder in the form of Women is very less, so does all prevention of Terrorist act will be only for men? Drink and drive very women does, so does the same law should be only for men?

Request all honest citizen of India, Stop this legal terrorism of India against Indian men and demand to your MP/MLA to make gender neutral LAW as a Natural Justice all over world follow and immediately replace the word "Husband/wife" to "Spouse" and "Men/women" to "Person" or be ready to pay heavy price tomorrow as crime in society is going to increase in multiform. 


Many men well fare NGO shocked and finds it hard to believe that given the credibility and collective legal experience of the committee how could the committee choose and include only archaic and highly dangerous clauses and exclude female sexual predators or crime done by women who are also guilty of committing sexual assault and acid attack?

Presumption of guilt of a man, removal of misuse clause for women and adding an additional section for matrimonial rape in additional to already existing 15 laws for women in a matrimonial setting is something very preposterous on part of the committee. While the human rights, social rights, and legal rights of women were brought up many times by Justice Verma in his press conference, none of the same rights have been conferred on men through his legal recommendations. Men cannot expect to get a fair trial should any of these recommendations come into existence.
The above news proved beyond reasonable dought doubt on the level of due diligence claimed by the committee in the law amendment recommendations and believes it is essentially a blind copy of the recommendations proposed by a handful of aggressive women’s organizations invited for deposition.
So, my humble request , law should not be on emotion and crime does not have any sex, caste or religion , so the first priority the law should be gender neutral. If women do not do rape , they will not be punished, but outright say, women do not do rape or sexual assault, is wrong and such mindset in law making process will increase the crime in society.





Join SIF Team to Stop this legal terrorism of India and demand to replace the word Husband/wife to Spouse and Men/women to Person to related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all Women born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all Men born in Criminal family. 

 

 Must Read :

  1.  Justice Verma Report Biased to protect the Rapist women
  2. Acid attack to kill husband
  3. India man in acid attack after dispute - Sky News

  4. Woman throws acid on sister-in-law over land dispute - The ...

  5. Acid attacks in India are NOT gender biased - Rediff.com ...

  6. PG Student Throws Acid on Teacher For Not Marrying Her

     







 

Thursday, 24 January 2013

NGO’s working for Men’s Welfare strongly and jointly condemn the legal recommendations made by the Justice Verma committee.


This press conference is being conducted by a coalition of NGOs under the umbrella of the Save Indian Family  (SIF). All NGOs are non-funded , non-profit NGOs fighting for men’s rights, Gender Equality, Judicial accountability and balanced laws. This press conference has been scheduled to highlight the shocking level of biased and anti-male legal recommendations released by the Justice Verma committee.

The coalition is shocked and finds it hard to believe that given the credibility and collective legal experience of the committee how could the committee choose and include only archaic and highly dangerous clauses and exclude female sexual predators who are guilty of committing sexual assault .

Presumption of guilt of a man, removal of misuse clause for women and adding an additional section for matrimonial rape in additional to already existing 15 laws for women in a matrimonial setting is something very preposterous on part of the committee. While the human rights, social rights, and legal rights of women were brought up many times by Justice Verma in his press conference, none of the same rights have been conferred on men through his legal recommendations. Men cannot expect to get a fair trial should any of these recommendations come into existence.

The coalition expresses grave doubt on the level of due diligence claimed by the committee in the law amendment recommendations and believes it is essentially a blind copy of the recommendations proposed by a handful of aggressive women’s organizations invited for deposition.

1. From the report it is clear that a handful of women’s groups were selectively invited for deposition in front of the committee. Most of these groups invited are widely known for their aggressive anti-male approach to gender laws and inclination to safeguard female criminals from crimes against men.

2. That not a single organization working for men’s welfare was invited shows the poor democratic values displayed by the committee. The committee owes an explanation to the citizenry on how it could get the time to listen so many women’s groups but could not find the time to listen to even one men’s welfare group even though men constitute 50% of the population.

3. Female sexual predators have been completely exempted from sexual assault just on account of their gender and the perpetrator has been made a man ONLY. This a unbelievably anti-male stance since the legal systems in whole world as well as the Indian law commission and in its years of collective legal expertise believes that women are as likely to commit sexual assault as men are.

4. Punishment for Misuse of sexual harassment at workplace has now been removed without any reason whatsoever. Also protection for men from sexual harassment has not been included. World over most of the countries have gender neutral sexual harassment laws, a fact that this committee has ignored for the reasons not known.


5. The fact of false rape cases has not been intentionally addressed even as the media and police from various states report that false rapes constitute over 75% to 90% rapes in India. It is believed that rape laws are misused even more than IPC 498A by some studies.

6. Marital rape has been included as a DUPLICATE section even though DV act (Section 3(ii)) is more than capable of addressing these issues. This has been done just to duplicate another cruelty law to increase misuse against men with another anti-male matrimonial recommendation and is a clear violation as per the settled principles of Double Jeopardy. It is shocking that instead of reducing the number of laws for cruelty this committee in all its collective experience has recommended the increase of additional law. As always, women sexual predators have been exempted from punishment for sexually harassing husbands and male children.

7. The committee has ignored the principles of natural justice and in Rape cases supports presumption of guilt on the accused and presumption of truthfulness on the female complainant. We are surprised on how a committee which such eminent panel members chose to ignore this fundamental pillar of justice even as the police reports states that over 74% to 90% rapes in India are false. These recommendations flout the basic principle for laying down the Laws on India which ensures that innocents would get punished by “assumption of being guilty” and going through “grilling Legal process” without any fault.

8. The committee has also not recommended any solution to the overwhelming majority of rape cases in Indian which are consensual sex converted to rape later by women when the relationship sours or marriage does not take place for fault of either of parties.

9. A court in Delhi has recently ticked off a mother and daughter duo for habitually filing false rape cases for grabbing property. There are millions more like these who have filed false cases when jilted or with a hidden agenda. Since over 74% to 90% reported rape cases are false in India, a person accused of sexual assault cannot expect to get a fair trial at all if all of the relevant evidence of the alleged victim’s sexual history is not presented before the court. However the committee has recommended that past sexual escapades of a woman will have no bearing on the current cases essentially striking down another defense of the innocently accused.

10. The Justice Verma committee has diluted Section 14 of the Sexual Harassment Bill appears concerned that it is liable for misuse , while on the issue of 498a misuse which is widely documented the law commission noted that misuse of a section is not ground for removing it. Why are double standards being followed for men and women ?
Demands:

The coalition of multinational NGOs supporting this press conference strongly opposes the legal recommendations and amendments and states that these recommendations if implemented will lead to millions of men being denied protection from crimes committed by women. 

They will essentially be deemed as rapists without any hope of getting a fair trail even as female sexual predators and female false rape case and sexual harassment filers will roam freely in society. The coalition hereby demands that the legal recommendations be scrapped in its entirety and below amends be made.

1. Make Rape Law Gender Neutral as in other countries of the globe with punishment for female sex offenders.

2. Relationship consensual cases should not be allowed to be converted into rape cases as it is insane to do so.

3. Matrimonial rape must be removed as it a duplication of law and will be subject to heavy misuse.

3. Sections like presumption of guilt, suppressing previous sexual behavior and any other section that interferes with right to innocence of an accused and prevents the accused from getting a fair and just trial should be removed.

3. False complaints of Rape cases and sexual harassment cases should be punished severely, so that men are protected.

4. Introduce the much required police reforms and Judicial reforms to ensure justice to all.
Supported By:

 INSAAF, Save Family Foundation Delhi, All India Men's
Welfare Association, Indian Affiliate Chapter of Association for International Men's Rights Activism and
Welfare, MASI , AIFW , MASHAAL, MRA Pune , MILPF, HRIDAYA, Bhavya Foundation.

Contact: 9818789236 (Swarup) .

Must Read :
Justice Verma Report Biased to protect the Rapist women


 







Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Justice Verma Report Biased to protect the Rapist women


The Justice Verma Reports put blame to every institution start from police, citizen of India, army, politicians left, right and center, except the Judiciary. 

He had totally failed to make Judges responsible for delay in judgements and unable to give justice UN-biased way , result the real victim avoid to go to court for justice  but innocent people dragged in court in false and fabricated cases years together by greedy , money minded people , who use the law as extortion tool , which even Supreme court termed as "Legal Terrorism " in the cases of 498A.

The double standard of Justice Verma Committe exposed and contracted statement made in Workplace harassment bill demanding through  recommendation that the said provision be deleted:
(l) Action in relation to False or Malicious Complaints or Giving of False Evidence:
The present Section 14 of the Sexual Harassment Bill appears to be a provision which is liable to misuse.

So, on the ground of "Misuse" they want the same to be deleted, but on the other hand there are several LAW and SC judgments mentioned "Misuse" of any provision of LAW is not a ground for scrap or delete a LAW.

Unable to understand why they are in such double standard and contracted view expressed.

The above view itself confirms beyond reasonable dought the committee itself had caught red handed with their own ill intention logic towards the "Misuse" of  Law is valid ground applicable to all LAW and the sufficient care should be taken to avoid the "Misuse of LAW".

The most surprising Justice Verma Reports refuse to acknowledge the need of make the Rape law Gender Neutral, which is followed by all over the world. He gives enough examples of international LAW and Justice system , but we unable to understand what restrict him to accept the LAW commission Reports to make the Rape LAW gender Neutral?

Why he wants to protect the Rapist women of India?

If women do not do the rape they will not be Punished, but why they afraid to accept the same?

We had given enough examples the women rape child , rape on men and then kill them , cut in 11pics , 17 pics , but he totally ignored the same in IPC 375.

In case of under age child sex cases : They also conveniently given the exemption to women , where we witness so many international judgements when women had been punished for rape of child.

7. Section 375 shall be replaced as suggested below by Justice Verma Committee:

Section 375: Rape
375. A man is said to commit rape if he—
(a) penetrates the vagina or anus or urethra of a person with—
(i) any part of his body including his penis or,
(ii) any object manipulated by him, except where such penetration is carried out for
proper hygienic or medical purposes; or,
(b) manipulates any part of the body of a person so as to cause penetration of the vagina
or anus or urethra of another person; or,
(c) engages in “cunnilingus” or “fellatio”,
under the circumstances falling under any of the following six descriptions:—
Firstly.—Against the person’s will; or,
Secondly.— Without the person’s consent; or,
Thirdly, With the person’s consent, where such consent has been obtained by putting the
person, or any other person in whom the person is interested, in fear of death or of hurt;
or,
Fourthly.— With the person’s consent, when the man induces the person to consent to
the relevant act by impersonating another man to whom the victim would have
otherwise knowingly consented to; or,
Fifthly, With the person’s consent, when at the time of giving such consent, by reason of
unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by the man personally or
through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, the person is unable to
understand the nature and consequences of the action to which he/she gives consent; or,
Sixthly, When the person is unable to communicate consent either express or impliedly.
Explanation I.— For the purposes of this section, “penetration” means penetration of the
vagina, anus or urethra to any extent.
Explanation II.—For the purposes of this section, “vagina” shall also include labia
majora.
Explanation III: Consent will not be presumed in the event of an existing marital
relationship between the complainant and the accused.
Explanation IV. - Consent means an unequivocal voluntary agreement when the person
by words, gestures or any form of non-verbal communication, communicates
willingness to participate in the specific act.

Provided that, a person who does not offer actual physical resistance to the act of
penetration is not by reason only of that fact, to be regarded as consenting to the sexual
activity.

12. A new Section 376B defining and punishing rape of an underage person shall
be added:
Section 376B(1): Rape of an underage person: If a man has sexual intercourse with a
person below sixteen years1 of age with or without that person’s consent, he shall be
rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years, but which may
extend to imprisonment for life.

Provided that the existence of a marital relationship between the accused and the
underage person shall not be a valid defence.

Explanation: For the purposes of this section, sexual intercourse shall mean any of the
acts specified in Section 375 (a) to (c).

From the above it is clear Justice Verma committee reports not only biased , it had promoted the hidden agenda of some male hater women organizations who wants to protect the "Rapist women " of India.
The word "Men" should be replaced by the word "Person" as recommended by Law commission . If women do not do rape they will not not be punished , but protection of Rapist women is not all acceptable.



The Verma Committee is totally silent to plug the loop whole of Indian rape law :

We have some skewed definition of  r@pe. After living for two years or so as live-in-partners and sleeping in  the same bed, to accuse the male partner of r@pe if he refused to marry is  the height absurdity. And police recording it as r@pe the culmination of stupidity. Such stupid definition no country all over the world have. First need to plug this loop hole first or cry for rape is increasing and increasing .

The most dangerous is 2. Amendment to Section 114A , where the women verbal statement is sufficient to term any Tom/Dick/harry is Rapist.

This must be deleted or there will be promotion of injustice and many innocent people will be convected , as we all know women does not born in Raja Harish Chandra Family ( never lie).

For section 114A of the Evidence Act, the following section shall be substituted,
namely:—

‘114A. (1) In a prosecution for rape under sub-section (2) of section 376 or for gang rape
under Section 376C of the Indian Penal Code, where sexual intercourse by the accused is
proved and the question is whether it was without the consent of the other person
alleged to have been raped and such other person states in his/her evidence before the
court that she or he did not consent, the court shall presume that she or he did not
consent.
Explanation.—In this section “sexual intercourse” shall mean any of the acts mentioned
in clauses (a) to (c) of section 375 of the Indian Penal Code.

So, my humble request , law should not be on emotion and crime does not have any sex, caste or religion , so the first priority the law should be gender neutral. If women do not do rape , they will not be punished, but outright say, women do not do rape or sexual assault, is wrong and such mindset in law making process will increase the crime in society.


Our Proposal : 

If you really want the same should not be misused left ,right and center the way in 498A/DV act the word relative misused .
or
Be ready the Rape statistics will be double in next two years and it will became another extortion, blackmailing and easy money earning business for all Advocate, Police and greedy people.

Summary of our Recommendations and Request to meet your MP/MLA/Ministers and demand:

1)    Make Rape Law Gender Neutral as in other countries of the globe
2)    Relationship cheating cases should not be allowed to be converted into rape cases which suck the scare resources from genuine rape cases.
3)    False complaints of Rape cases, should be punished severely, so that genuine cases like ‘Nirbhaya’, gets justice.
4)    Introduce the much required police reforms to increase conviction rates of rape cases
5)    Introduce the much required judicial reforms for speedier justice and to increase conviction rates of rape cases.

·        All references to “Man” or “Woman” must be replaced with the word “Person” or “Whosoever”
·        All references to “His” or “Her” to be must be replaced with the word “His or Her”
·        All references to  “He” or  “She” must be replaced with the word “He or She”
·        All references to the word ‘Husband” or “Wife” must be replaced with the word “Spouse”

Live-in-relationship or marriage disputes should not be be included in the Sexual Assault as the same already covered under Domestic Violence act.

Danger for Future Child & Men :

Justice Verma Committee had seen only one side of the coin with biased view , though they give big lecture of international law and Justice system, but failed to identify the real problem and totally keep blind eye of suffering of Men and child in the hand of  "Rapist women" along with "False/fabricated Rape" cases.

A man or child can't be file rape case against women , let she rape you every day and then cut your body in 11 or 17 pieces.

The final punch :

Indian Woman : Murder any man and demand immunity under IPC 100 saying he was trying to rape me. don't forgot to Thank


Must read : 

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?

Monday, 21 January 2013

Any women die in hanging and suicide to be termed as Gang Rape only!!

New law of land by media: Any women die in hanging and suicide to be termed as Gang Rape only!!

Great Indian media Yellow Journalism.



A post mortem has found that the woman who was found hanging from a tree in Bhagalpur had not been gangraped, an NDTV report says. The police now suspect that the woman killed herself.
Police initially said the 32-year-old victim, who was a passenger of the Brahmaputra Mail that was travelling to the national capital, was dragged to the mango orchard and gang-raped by unidentified persons after she alighted from the train between Vikramshila and Kahalgaon stations.

Representative image. AP
The police recovered the body on Sunday and sent it to the Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital in Bhagalpur for post-mortem.

The victim, who hails from New Jalpaiguri in West Bengal, took the train from Alipore to Delhi, along with her son.

As the train was jam packed, she tried to get down at Sahibganj but was prevented from doing so by co-passengers, ASP, Bhagalpur, Meenu Kumari said.

When the train slowed down between Vikramshila and Kahalgaon stations, she jumped out. It is not clear why she took this step.

Liquor bottles were found at the spot, Kumari said. A railway ticket and cellphone number of her village pradhan written on a piece of paper were recovered from the victim’s possession, police added.
with inputs from PTI.


For more details must read :

Wake up call for Indian Men: Be Ready for False/Fabricated Rape Case on you! »

Thursday, 3 January 2013

Wake up call for Indian Men: Be Ready for False/Fabricated Rape Case on you!


By citing some extreme cases of rape and murder , Indian government and women organizations are on process to change the Present Rape law as mentioned below :

( Present punishment for rape is minimum 7 years and maximum life sentence).

Government and women organizations proposal  under consideration:

1. The Punishment should be Hang to death even for simple rape, presently it is Rape and Murder.
2. Proposal for chemical castration to men.
3. Acused have to prove that he had not done the rape, the women does not need to give any proof ( even medical test also not need to file rape cases), her verbal statement is sufficient to term any one rapist , she have to just claim she had been raped or gang raped and who ever to be named to be arrested immediately and they will not get bail till the case is over, let case goes no 1months or 20 years.
4. As soon as she file the case let it be true or false, she will get minimum 2 Lacks rupees. Rupees 50 thousands immediately and then as case progress. This is irrespective the case is true or false.
5. A rape victim will get government job by default, so now you do not need any qualification or skill to get a government Job, you have to just get raped and secure a government Job.
6. Consent to sex: Any physical relation, at the time she can be fine or even she can enjoy the same, but after ward she can change her mind and term the same a rape with excuse like , she was drunk, she was promised for marriage, she was promised for job, she was under threat ,  means the consent is depend purely on women's will and wish.
7. Most important the law commission advice to make the rape law "Gender Neutral", so that any rape by women to other women , men to other men, women to child can be covered, but women organizations and govt not ready to do that.
8. For any disputes in marriage or divorce the wife can file the Rape case on you along with 498A, DV act, Crpc125, Section24, Child custody and you will not have any defense.
9. There should not be any Punishment to women for making "False and Fabricated" rape or gang Rape case to any one.
10. A man can't be file rape case against women , let she rape you every day and then cut your body in 11 or 17 pieces.



Our Proposal : 

If you really want the same should not be misused left ,right and center the way in 498A/DV act the word relative misused .
or
Be ready the Rape statistics will be double in next two years and it will became another extortion, blackmailing and easy money earning business for all Advocate, Police and greedy people.

Summary of our Recommendations and Request to meet your MP/MLA/Ministers and demand:

1)    Make Rape Law Gender Neutral as in other countries of the globe
2)    Relationship cheating cases should not be allowed to be converted into rape cases which suck the scare resources from genuine rape cases.
3)    False complaints of Rape cases, should be punished severely, so that genuine cases like ‘Nirbhaya’, gets justice.
4)    Introduce the much required police reforms to increase conviction rates of rape cases
5)    Introduce the much required judicial reforms for speedier justice and to increase conviction rates of rape cases.

·        All references to “Man” or “Woman” must be replaced with the word “Person” or “Whosoever”
·        All references to “His” or “Her” to be must be replaced with the word “His or Her”
·        All references to  “He” or  “She” must be replaced with the word “He or She”
·        All references to the word ‘Husband” or “Wife” must be replaced with the word “Spouse”

Live-in-relationship or marriage disputes should not be be included in the Sexual Assault as the same already covered under Domestic Violence act.



Must read : 

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?